top of page

Instruction

Educator.png

Development as an Educator.

My approach to education has developed through more than a decade of experience spanning K–12 instruction, curriculum leadership, graduate and undergraduate teaching, and university faculty development. With an M.Ed. in Learning, Design, and Technology and doctoral preparation in Information Science and Learning Technologies and Educational Leadership and Policy Analysis, I bring together practical teaching experience, instructional design, and interdisciplinary scholarship. I approach teaching as an opportunity to develop critical thinking, intellectual independence, and the ability to evaluate and apply knowledge. My experience teaching biology established a foundation in scientific inquiry and evidence-based reasoning, while my work in educational technology has reinforced the importance of accessibility, meaningful engagement, and thoughtful integration of technology. My teaching interests now extend to research methodology, including computational text analysis, qualitative inquiry, mixed-methods research, and the critical evaluation of artificial intelligence in research. I believe research questions should guide methodological choices, and I encourage students to examine assumptions, evaluate evidence, and defend their interpretations rather than relying exclusively on familiar approaches. Across my teaching and faculty development work, I strive to create learning environments that are accessible, intellectually engaging, and responsive to individual needs. The experiences below illustrate how I put these commitments into practice.

Pencil.png

Teaching Experience.

Instructor of Record

ISLT 2467: Empowering Learners with Technology

Fall 2024  & Spring 2025

University of Missouri

I taught an online undergraduate course examining how educational technologies can support learning, engagement, and student success.

​

Through asynchronous activities, assessments, and interactive synchronous sessions, students explored the opportunities and limitations of technology in educational settings. I emphasized critical evaluation of instructional tools rather than technology adoption for its own sake.

​

I supported student learning through clear communication, individualized guidance, timely feedback, and activities designed to promote reflection, collaboration, and practical application.

Philosophy.png

Teaching Philosophy.

I believe education should prepare students to think critically, engage thoughtfully with others, and make informed decisions in an increasingly complex world. While professional preparation is an important function of higher education, I see the development of intellectual independence, ethical reasoning, and the ability to evaluate evidence as equally essential. These abilities extend beyond any particular discipline or career path. At the center of my teaching philosophy is the belief that every student deserves an educator who approaches them with an open mind, genuine care, and a willingness to meet them where they are. I view my role as a guide who supports students in developing their own understanding, confidence, and intellectual voice. I strive to create learning environments where questions are welcomed, different perspectives are respected, and students feel comfortable taking intellectual risks. My approach emphasizes inquiry and critical engagement rather than memorization or the uncritical application of established techniques. This perspective informs my interest in teaching research methods. I believe students should learn to select methods based on the questions they seek to answer, examine the assumptions underlying different approaches, and evaluate the strengths and limitations of the evidence they produce. Whether teaching computational analysis, qualitative inquiry, or educational technology, I encourage students to consider not only how to use a method or tool, but also what its use allows them to understand and what it may overlook. Accessibility, clarity, and flexibility are also central to my teaching. I establish clear expectations, provide consistent communication, and encourage students to advocate for their learning needs. When students encounter difficulties, I prioritize understanding the circumstances affecting their progress and identifying ways to support their success. My experience in K–12 education, online learning, and university faculty development has reinforced the importance of recognizing that students approach learning with different experiences, responsibilities, and needs. I value both independent reflection and collaborative learning. Some ideas require time for individual exploration, while others become clearer through discussion, shared inquiry, and engagement with differing perspectives. I aim to balance these opportunities so that students develop confidence in their own reasoning while recognizing the value of learning from others. Ultimately, I hope students leave my courses with more than disciplinary knowledge or technical competencies. I want them to feel empowered to ask meaningful questions, critically evaluate information, communicate thoughtfully, and engage responsibly with the world. My goal is to help students develop the skills and confidence to pursue their own intellectual interests with curiosity and integrity.

©2026 by Heather Thach.

bottom of page